WERE you perhaps thinking that the previous First Minister Nicola Sturgeon was slightly idle in office apart from in the engineering of Scottish independence, you will be happier with the incumbent Humza Yousaf, who has patently done little or nothing for the Scots, but has made a lot of noise about Gaza, which is clearly an important element of his remit. If you are cold, hungry or living on the street in Scotland, his trumpeting concerning the Middle East will doubtless have cheered you greatly. Vincent Saunders, Troon, Ayrshire.
HOW reassuring it is to have Angus Robertson in charge of Scotland’s “external affairs” – even if foreign policy is a reserved issue. Mr Robertson tells us not only that having a secessionist Scotland expel nuclear weapons from its territory would be no obstacle to Scotland joining NATO but also that it “would not embolden Putin” (“Ditching Trident ‘will not boost Putin'”, The Herald, March 5). How lucky we are to have someone with such insight into the minds of both Nato leaders and Vladimir Putin making policy for us. This is the message from the SNP’s latest taxpayer-funded propaganda paper in a series that, in SNP eyes, makes the case for separatism. In reality, this paper, like its predecessors – particularly the risible effort allegedly making the economic case – is a catalogue of wishful thinking based on best-case scenarios unsupported by evidence. Thus Scotland “would have a strong voice internationally” and “would be able to negotiate for ourselves and deliver on our own priorities”. As usual, it is all about burnishing Scotland’s image on the assumption that admiring foreigners will bend to its will. Mr Robertson seems unaware of two things. Yes, there are Nato members who do not have and do not host nuclear weapons. But these same members have not at any time had nuclear weapons on their territory that they have chosen to relinquish. Second, NATO, and especially its General Secretary, Jens Stoltenberg, has spoken very soberly and even sternly of the need for Nato members to increase their defence spending, to prepare for any future Russian aggression. Mr Robertson confirmed that Scotland would not have its own submarines but would concentrate on maritime patrol aircraft. Beyond that, it is not clear what Scotland would have to offer Nato. On April 29, 2022, the SNP’s defence spokesman, Stewart McDonald explained that Scotland should develop a “capability in military medicine that we can readily offer partners in time of need”, conjuring up images of uniformed personnel carrying first aid boxes around a battlefield. At least the SNP is consistent, getting civil servants once more to labour long and hard to produce yet another vanity exercise in separatist pie-in-the-sky aspiration. Jill Stephenson.
IT’S bad enough the ferries being built at Ferguson Marine shipyard are to cost four times the original estimate and years late after the contract was signed in 2014, but we are now being advised passenger capacity of the ferries will be 300 fewer than the original specification. This is not a result of bad workmanship by the shipyard workers but entirely due to the • Scottish Government quango CMAC dithering and changing the build specification during the construction stage and giving Ferguson an impossible programme. Dennis Forbes Grattan, Aberdeen.
THE Scottish NHS is again the subject of negative headlines (Mail, March 5). When was there last a good news story about our SNP/Green-control-led health service? Perhaps though some help is finally on hand. Why can we not go back to a four-year term in office for Holyrood? It was artificially extended to five years by the SNP. I suspect most Scots would be happy to see an election in 2025 rather than 2026. What about it, Mr Yousaf? Gerald Edwards, Glasgow.