English delivery driver working in Scotland who was called an ‘English p***k’ by his boss wins £13,000 in race discrimination payout – Daily Mail

An English delivery driver working in Scotland has won £13,000 in a race discrimination claim after his boss called him an ‘English p***k’ and told him ‘you’ll be going back on the bus like your football team’.

David Hawksworth was subjected to a campaign of racial harassment by Scottish depot manager Patrick Murray, who ‘had a dislike of him’ because he was English and ‘spread lies about him being a sex offender’, Hawksworth claimed.

Within weeks of joining Greencore Food To Go, a food delivery company with a depot in Glasgow, Mr Murray called Mr Hawksworth an ‘English p***k’ and ‘English b*****d’.

Mr Hawksworth, who had moved to Scotland and had an obvious English accent, was also told ‘once Scotland gained independence’ that he would need to ‘go home’.

In another incident during the 2018 World Cup, Mr Murray told Mr Hawksworth that he would ‘soon be on the bus back to England like the football team’.

Now Mr Hawksworth has sued Greencore Food To Go for racial discrimination by harassment and unfair dismissal and won £13,306.

An employment tribunal heard Mr Hawksworth, who started as a delivery driver in April 2018, was left ‘offended’ and ‘violated’ by the racial harassment.

A tribunal report said: ‘Within a few weeks of starting work it became clear to him that the respondent’s depot manager Mr Patrick Murray did not value him.

‘On one occasion whilst using the forklift truck to load the vans, Mr Murray referred to Mr Hawksworth as an ‘English p***k’. Mr Hawksworth responded with ‘I beg your pardon’, indicating that he was offended and registering his objection.

‘Mr Murray told the tribunal that ‘p***k’ was his ‘go to’ swear word, but denied that he used the description of the claimant being English. It was clear to the tribunal that Mr Murray did use this phrase towards Mr Hawksworth.’

Mr Hawksworth also accused Mr Murray of ‘spreading lies about him being a sex offender’ after Mr Hawksworth mentioned that he was due to attend court allegations of stalking that were ultimately dropped.

Another colleague, Craig Steen, was said to have called Mr Hawksworth a ‘paedo’ on rounds.

The relationship between Mr Hawksworth and the company broke down over time and he was signed off work for stress.

Mr Hawksworth took on a second job while off work, like others did at the company, but was summoned to a disciplinary hearing and sacked in August 2020.

Employment Judge Sally Cowen, sitting at a virtual Scottish employment tribunal, ruled that Mr Hawksworth was racially harassed on grounds of his nationality and unfairly dismissed due to a flawed procedure.

Judge Cowen said: ‘The fact that Mr Murray chose to add the adjective ‘English’ [on his insults], is a mark of the fact that Mr Murray was identifying Mr Hawksworth as someone of a different nationality and an identifying characteristic.

‘Mr Hawksworth perceived the comment to be intimidating, demeaning and hurtful. The tribunal considered that Mr Hawksworth’s perception of the comment was reasonable in the circumstances and that the comment was harassment.

‘The tribunal is content that Mr Murray did say that Mr Hawksworth would soon be on a bus home to England, like the English football team.

‘Mr Murray did not deny saying it, but the only explanation he could give, was that it was said as banter.

‘Colin Lowe [a Greencore regional director] said that Mr Murray’s behaviour was unacceptable and the Tribunal agree with this view.

‘Furthermore, the tribunal consider that the comment was made due to Mr Hawksworth’s nationality and was offensive and demeaning to the claimant and violated his dignity.

‘The tribunal also found that Mr Murray acted in this way because Mr Hawksworth was English and because Mr Murray has a dislike of Mr Hawksworth on that basis.’

The judge added that the harassment had an impact on Mr Hawksworth’s mental health, financial difficulties due to the prolonged nature of the offending.

She added: ‘The tribunal were satisfied that the acts of harassment amounted to a course of conduct by Mr Murray who did not like Mr Hawksworth and chose to harass him on the grounds of his nationality.’

Greencore Food To Go provide delivery services across the UK and have a depot in Glasgow.

Nicola Sturgeon accused of hiding behind ‘Scottish exceptionalism’ over pandemic mistakes – Yahoo News

Nicola Sturgeon has been accused of hiding behind “Scottish exceptionalism” instead of admitting she made even worse mistakes than Boris Johnson in the early stages of the pandemic.

Laying out a timeline of key decisions made by the governments in Edinburgh and London, Anas Sarwar argued that the actions of SNP ministers were “often more fatal” than those in the UK.

The Scottish Labour leader said that while the First Minister “has always been better at spinning her failures than Boris Johnson”, much of the “damning testimony” from Dominic Cummings on the UK’s Covid response is as true for Holyrood as it is for Westminster.

Speaking at First Minister’s Questions on Thursday, Mr Sarwar pointed towards a range of decisions made by SNP ministers around mass gatherings, herd immunity, care homes and Covid-19 testing that were in “lockstep” or slower than the UK Government.

While both governments sent untested and Covid positive hospital patients into care homes, the UK Government announced routine testing on April 15 – a decision not made by SNP ministers until six days later on April 21.

Other key decisions made in Scotland later than England include mandatory face masks on public transport, asymptomatic community testing and testing for incoming travellers at airports.

It comes after SNP Deputy Westminster leader Kirsten Oswald on Wednesday argued there should be “no crowing from the Tories about their handling of the crisis given the clear mistakes which have been made along the way”.

But Mr Sarwar has urged Nicola Sturgeon to establish a Scotland-specific inquiry into how her government responded.

The First Minister has come under repeated pressure to begin preparations for a judge-led Covid-19 inquiry that is Scotland specific, but SNP ministers say they will wait until a decision is made by the UK Government on the remit and scope of its equivalent inquiry.

“The Scottish people deserve more than just rhetoric, they deserve answers. They deserve more than being told that the government cares, they deserve answers because we can’t allow Scottish exceptionalism to stop us from learning critical lessons,” Mr Sarwar said, arguing that “we don’t need to wait for the UK Government” to do this.

“It’s always easier to focus on failures elsewhere but we must learn from mistakes here at home,” he added.

In response, Ms Sturgeon suggested the public could judge whether she has an “inability to face up to mistakes” but her focus was now on the vaccine rollout because Scotland could be “in the foothills of a third wave of this virus”.

“I think what they’re hearing from me is a candid admission that we would not – like many other governments across the world – have got everything right, and not just a willingness [but] a desire to face up to that and learn from that,” she added.

Scottish Government accused of ‘inaction’ over new covid variant found in Glasgow – Daily Record

The Scottish Government should have moved quicker to warn Glasgow residents of the presence of a new covid variant in the city, Labour has claimed.

Nicola Sturgeon used a media briefing on May 14 to announce Scotland’s most populous council area would have to remain at Level 3 of lockdown while the rest of the country moved to Level 2.

It came after a localised outbreak of virus cases was detected in Glasgow’s southside, with the new Delta variant blamed.

Scottish Labour health spokeswoman Jackie Baillie said residents should have been warned sooner – but the SNP accused her of making a “ludicrous attack”.

The First Minister had spoken at an earlier media briefing on May 11 to suggest mainland Scotland was ready to move to Level 2.

Glasgow was finally moved to Level as of today – meaning residents can finally legally invite people into their own homes for non-essential purposes for the first time in eight months.

In a written response to a question lodged by Scottish Labour, Deputy First Minister John Swinney confirmed the Scottish Government was initially informed that the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of covid-19 had been upgraded from a ‘variant of interest’ to ‘a variant of concern’ on May 6.

Baillie said: “This is shocking evidence of inaction, dither and delay at the heart of the SNP government.

“Instead of taking decisive action to ramp up testing and vaccinations when the threat was first identified, the SNP sat on their hands – potentially prolonging Glasgow’s lockdown through inaction.

“Businesses were allowed to plan to reopen and are now at breaking point. People made plans to see their loved ones that couldn’t go ahead. People’s finances and mental health have been pushed to the brink.

“The people of Glasgow and, indeed, the people of Scotland deserve so much better.

“The Government has a duty to act swiftly to protect the health and wellbeing of the citizens of Scotland – they have catastrophically failed in their duty.”A spokesman for Humza Yousaf said: “This is a ludicrous attack by Jackie Baillie, who either doesn’t grasp the basic facts or is deliberately trying to mislead people.

“The fact the Delta variant was a variant of concern was already widespread public knowledge on May 7, when it was publicly declared as such by Public Health England for all four nations of the UK

“The designation of a variant is a quite separate process from outbreak management, where health protection teams work in local areas to assess the risk and deliver a proportionate response.

“That is exactly what happened in this case with Glasgow, where we continued to monitor the situation and decided not to relax restrictions as a result – the very opposite of the inaction Labour suggest.

“Jackie Baillie should get her facts right, and in the meantime apologise for trying to mislead the public.”